PREFERENSI PENGGUNA TERHADAP KUALITAS TAMAN KOTA AKTIF HASIL CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DI KOTA MALANG
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asmuliany, A. 2014. Identifikasi Tingkat Penggunaan Ruang Terbuka Publik Di Kota Makassar, Di Lihat Dari Aspek Aktivitas, Fasilitas Dan Kriteria Perancangan. Jurnal Teknosains. 8(1): 1–18.
Diinillah, A. S., & Sulistyarso, H. 2017. Preferensi Pemerintah terhadap Pengembangan Melalui Program Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR). Jurnal Teknik ITS. 6(2): 571–574.
Ilmiajayanti, F., & Dewi, D. I. K. 2015. Persepsi Pengguna Taman Tematik Kota Bandung Terhadap Aksesibilitas dan Pemanfaatannya. Ruang. 1(1): 21–30.
International Organization for Standardization. 2010. ISO 26000 and OECD Guidelines. In ISO. www.iso.org/sr
Katja, V. 2017. Standard for green areas. Lahti University of Applied Sciences.
Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., & Madureira, T. 2018. Preferences for urban green space characteristics: A comparative study in three Portuguese cities. Environments – MDPI. 5(2): 1–
Malek, N. A., Mariapan, M., & Shariff, M. K. M. 2012. The Making of a Quality Neighbourhood Park: A Path Model Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 49: 202–214.
NMVR Project Team. 2019. Non-Market Valuation with R. http://lab.agr.hokudai.ac.jp/nmvr/
Satria, B. A., & Navitas, P. 2016. Penetuan Tema Ruang Terbuka Hijau Aktif Di Kota Malang Berdasarakan Preferensi Masyarakat. Jurnal Teknik ITS. 5(1)
Siregar, J. P., Surjono, Rukmi, W. I., & Kurniawan, E. B. 2021. Evaluating accessibility to city parks utilizing a space syntax method. A case study: City parks in Malang city. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 916(1).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.